In the second part of our interview with Sirish Purohit, Director,
Midas Communications, Chennai, he throws light on the telecommunication
scenario in the city today.
The telecom scenario in Chennai
I think Chennai telecom has done very well. Especially in the past
4-5years. I mean, Phone is practically on demand here. The WLLs
(Wireless in Local Loop) will be helpful to get quick connections.
Even today there is a time delay in getting phone connections, say
at least 2-3 months. In some areas there might be problems with
the availability of cables. The terrain might be difficult for laying
cables. To give phone connections overnight Chennai telecom can
do with the WLLs.
What about accusations of WLL creating unequal
playing fields?
This
is all because of compartmentalising things which have overlapping
areas. This is one of the cases where the policy has to be more
open. What is happening is that you have a rule for cellular telephony
operators. You have a framework under which the cellular telephony
phones licenses are given. There is some tariff, revenue sharing
and license fee associated with it. Now there is another group,
which offers fixed telephony services and they have a different
set of rules. By regulation, these two - mobile telephony and fixed
telephony are different. Now we are entering an area where technology
offers certain overlapping areas. If you ask me for my reactions
on this, I would say, regulations are not in tune with the technological
changes. They should find regulations, which would either have an
equal playing field or if you have a situation where the same service
is offered in a different mechanism (because of technological changes),
then change the regulations.
So has liberalisation actually helped open
up the market?
No.
I feel as far as the telecom sector is concerned, it has not helped
at all. We had 6-7 years of liberalisation now and less than 2 lakh
lines all over India! Take the example of Tamil Nadu. It is one
of the biggest profit making centres in India as telephony circle.
But we do not have a basic private telephony operator in Tamil Nadu.
What kind of a policy is this? This policy has failed. This is going
in a crazy direction. In my opinion they should open up the telephony
access. The licenses should be given not at the state level, but
perhaps at the district levels. Then there would be a vertical proliferation
of the telecommunications access. DoT has already operations in
the major cities. It is only the smaller towns that face the problem
of communicating with the rest of the world. A statewide licensing
helps to connect only the major cities - Madurai, Coimbatore; not
Erode or Salem. This will not change the telephone scenario drastically.
Engineer- entrepreneur (as in the key people
at Midas Communications). That's a good trend.
With IT today, the capital requirement has come down for an entrepreneur.
As a matter of fact, in 1987-88 when we started some freelance work
, we suddenly realised that to start a business all you needed was
a P.C. and a telephone line which at year 2000 prices, works out
to Rs 50,000. Earlier, with the licence Raj, monopolies built up
considerably and these had huge capital outlays. To challenge them,
one needed an equally demanding high investement. Now technology
has changed all this. Small businesses have become viable growth
models.
Is Chennai geared up for all this?
Oh sure! Of course. For the past 2-3 years Chennai is the best
place to be in. Its advantages far outweigh its disadvantages now.
Its a calm and quiet place. Work culture is good here. Crime is
under control. Weather, you can't help it. If I could change one
thing in Chennai, it would be the weather.