What are the technological limitations placed
on e-business processes today?
More than the technological limitations, it’s the mindset limitations.
Most of the customers believe that they have to do e-business, but
they don’t know how to go about it. The good news is that it is
not like those ERP days, when ERP was really hot, but it
was constantly handled by IT. In the e-business scene, CEOs of
most companies are talking about it. But when it comes to actually
putting the money where the mouth is, it becomes a bit difficult.
Because these are big projects. The stage is still that of education.
Fortunately we are working with some organisations, which are educating
customers as to why they should not ignore this media.
E-business
is not going to replace your current business. That’s very clear.
In fact, we tell them e-business is another channel for you to leverage,
how to get to the customer, how to meet the customer, how to keep
the customer, how to service the customer. It provides you a more
efficient way of doing that. The important thing is to understand
how they can leverage better their current offline business to the
online activity. That’s where most of the education is happening
right now.
We did e-strategy for one of the companies many months back and
we recommended a certain step, and still they have not done anything
about that. They have even gone to the press saying that Satyam
Infoway helped them in doing that, but they haven’t done anything
yet. Each company is at a different stage in terms of adaptation.
It does require investment, may be not as significant as an ERP
implementation like SAP or something like that, but it does
require significant investment. So it’s not the technological limitation.
It’s more of a mindset. Its more of a, "Will I be the first
guinea pig?" kind of worry.
Digital certification of signatures. Has this
helped reassure users on the issue of security of transactions?
Even before digital signatures, our solution from Sterling Commerce
provided a stamp as to who is actually doing the transaction. That’s
more of the technology. Today digital signatures are used in the
B2C environment, rather than B2B. In India, even though the IT act
has come through, the implementation is still not clear. Because
we are yet to appoint a controller for digital signatures. The rules
are yet to be clear, as to who can provide, how can they provide,
what are the limitations and things like that. Those will really
determine how fast it’s adapted.
In India it’s not in place yet?
Not in place yet. We have been waiting for that for quite some
time. We have signed up with a company called Verisign, and
there is a company called Sayscript, which we own 100% right
now. We are expecting people to take a stake in that, so that it
becomes a standard. It will take some time before digital signatures
become the normal thing to do. Even in the US the act was passed
recently. Only now it has been made legal. We are not too far behind.
We are ready, whenever it happens we will be the first ones to support
that.
How much of Chennai business is ready for
e-business?
We
have something called an e-readiness index, which measures each
customer, in terms of IT infrastructure, processes, customer orientation,
geographical and product spread, how complex the business is. All
these factors tell you whether it’s required or not. If the business
is very smooth and you have almost two weeks of inventory in the
pipeline, you don’t need e-business. If you are already having a
negative working capital, you don’t need it. You might need it for
different reasons like planning for information rather than inventory
saving. So you need to find out why you need to do it. Those kinds
of exercises need to be done for each company. To determine whether
they need it or not. We have done projects for SRF, Henkel Spic,
Ford... so we have worked with a few companies, but industrial
houses like the TVS group, the Sanmar group, Amalgamations,
Ashok Leyland etc. haven’t done anything yet.
Are we through with the game of the eyeballs?
Are we seriously looking at other parameters for the net?
I will relate it to any new technology or any new finding that
people go through in life. There was the gold rush, than the tulip
rush…you have all these rushes. Initially its so hot, people do
not look at fundamentals. They forget the basics, how businesses
run and things like that. I think its good that it happened so fast.
It did not last too long. People got hurt, hopefully not too many.
What has happened is good. Good money will start to flow in. A lot
more reality checks will be in place. So that castles will not be
built in the air. Eyeballs will still be there. End of the day,
it’s a question of monetising. Like Jack Welch said the other
day on CNBC, "It doesn’t matter what you have on
the site, if you are unable to monetise it, its not worth being
there". Whether you are a newspaper site, GE, Doordarshan
or BNP. There has to be some level of monetisation. Monetisation
doesn’t necessarily mean advertisement; it has to have a monetary
value. It has to have the ability to invoke a transaction; it has
to have the ability to sell itself. So it’s no longer for the sake
of eyeballs. A lot more rational has to be built in. In any business
there will only be a few winners, and probably four to five people
will control 80% of the business, the next forty will control 18%
of the business and the rest will cover whatever.
In a recently concluded international advertising
convention, most people spoke of the net as 'the' medium for advertising.
Your views on this.
That is one other solution we are starting to offer our customers,
as to how they can actually leverage advertising on the net. Today,
people spend a lot of money on print media and TV. For them the
Internet is yet another media. Many of them do not understand how
this media works. So the good news on the net is we get feedback.
Whereas the other media, you are not quite sure. You have to depend
upon numbers that come once in a year. You have to depend on them
to get some feedback as to how your campaign went. Whereas the net
being an interactive media, that’s one big advantage.
But advertising on the net is not for everybody. Unless you are
on the net yourself, there is no use advertising. So any company
that wants to advertise on the net should have the presence. There
is no use advertising, and when they click on the ad, you are not
there. It’s not like a print ad. When the customer clicks on your
ad, you should be able to take him somewhere and give him something
and then make him transact. So it has to be a complete strategy.
Advertising doesn’t come on its own. It has to come after you define
your e-strategy. That’s the key. But advertising on the net will
increase. Some people are saying it will surpass any other media
in the next five years. As of today I will take it with a pinch
of salt. But that’s probably closer to truth. This is where you
get the users attention on a one-to-one basis.